Posts in the "Hots News" Category

  • microsoft-socl

    Microsoft has officially launched an “experimental” social networking site called So.cl, which combines facets of social networking, search, and media sharing with a user interface resembling Google+.

    When we last heard about it, So.cl (pronounced “Social”) was being billed as an “experimental research project” and was only available to students studying information and design at the University of Washington, Syracuse University, and New York University. While the project is still billed as experimental, it’s now open to anyone who wants to give it a shot.

    To get access to So.cl, you sign up using your Facebook or Windows Live ID. When you sign in for the first time, the site describes the experience as such:

    So.cl is an experiment in open search. That means your searches on So.cl are viewable by other So.cl users and will also be available to third parties.

    So.cl does not automatically post your searches, comments, or likes to your Facebook stream unless you choose this option. Also, we don’t contact your Facebook friends unless you invite them.

    After logging in you’ll notice the layout closely resembles Google+’s layout, but it also takes ideas from Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest. You can follow other So.cl users or follow interests like food, art, or movies. There’s also a “bookmarklet” feature that adds a “Share on So.cl” button to your bookmark bar so you can share content anywhere around the web with other So.cl users. Additionally, So.cl naturally appears to have close ties with Bing’s recently revamped social search.

    Looking at the “Everyone” feed, it’s easy to see what all So.cl users are searching for and sharing with the world. But alas, one of the biggest problems with “social search” is that we don’t always want to see what everyone else is searching for:

    You can read more about So.cl at the site’s FAQ page. Let us know in the comments what you think of it.

    Filed under: social

    Read More...
  • The all-computer run NASDAQ could be to blame for a lack of a Facebook stock pop Friday, when the social network started its first day of trading. Orders flooded in for the stock, but overwhelmed computers and glitches slowed trading down because stock orders couldn’t be processed, leaving investors wonder if their orders had gone through. If Facebook had gone with the New York Stock exchange, where there are redundant backup systems, it might have been a different story.

    By now you know that Facebook’s stock didn’t pop in its first day of trading, closing the day at $38.06. Reports emerged yesterday that trading didn’t begin until 11:30 EDT because of computer glitches on the NASDAQ. Investors were left waiting for computer confirmation on their orders and the price they paid for the stock. The NASDAQ’s automated system relies completely on computers that are supposed to be faster and more efficient than human traders.

    On the New York Stock Exchange computers run the show as well, but human traders work as a backup. If the computers slow down or crash, real people keep the trading going and can tell you immediately the status of your order and the price of your stock.

    Keith Bliss from Cuttone & Co. explained the human trading system on the NYSE in an interview with Bloomberg:

    “There is no redundancy inside their (the NASDAQ) market so they’re solely dependent on the computers being able to handle…what’s happening not only inside of the market, but also inside an IPO. Down here on the New York Stock Exchange, we have redundant systems and the redundant systems are the human-based traders who can have an open outcry auction market. If the systems go down, we can get the stock open and get orders into the market, they can execute them and can give you a report immediately.”

    In Silicon Valley, we keep hearing that computers are getting closer to replacing humans as processors get more powerful. Researchers are continuing to work towards the singularity, in which we create computers that are smarter than humans (and probably more powerful too — cue a robot uprising).

    While it will be decades, if not hundreds of years, before a computer has even close to processing power of the human brain, leaders in the industry are praising computers as faster and smarter than human beings. It’s ironic then that the largest tech IPO in U.S. history may have been hurt by computer-based system.

    Do you think if Facebook had chosen the New York Stock Exchange for its IPO that it would have done better? Answer the poll and sound off in the comments.

    Take Our Poll Filed under: VentureBeat

    Read More...
  • Google Motorola merger approved by China

    Chinese antitrust and competition authorities have approved Google’s deal to purchase Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion dollars, The Wall Street Journal reported Saturday. The merger, which was announced nine months ago in August 2011, will likely close next week.

    China was the last regulatory hold-out to approve the merger, which was approved by the United States Department of Justice and European Union regulators in February 2012. Now that China has given the go-ahead, the deal can be finalized. Google spokeswoman Niki Fenwick confirmed the news, according to the Associated Press.

    Antitrust issues were a major reason that regulatory boards had to mull over before approving the deal. Mainly, there were concerns that Motorola would be given preferential treatment for the Android operating system, which runs on Motorola devices. New updates or brand new versions of Android might go directly to Motorola, while taking much longer to reach other smartphone manufactures.

    Google defended itself saying it has no intentions of giving Motorola special treatment over other Android-running OEMs such as HTC, Samsung, and LG. Apparently the argument was enough for Google it get over all of the regulatory hurdles it needed to close the deal.

    Google is interested in purchasing Motorola mostly for its patents. Motorola holds 17,000 patents and 6,800 pending patent applications, many related to smartphone technology. Now that Google is duking it out in court with Oracle over Java-related patents, its more important than ever for Google to have a large patent shield so it can defend itself against future Android lawsuits.

    Google lego sign image via Flickr user Simon Law

    Filed under: mobile

    Read More...
  • So, Facebook is now public, and it got off to the most unimaginable and inauspicious start, losing $4 between the NASDAQ’s opening and closing bells.

    But don’t go jumping out any windows just yet.

    There’s no question that the IPO defied expectations in the worst way possible (well, perhaps not the worst), offering at $38 and closing just a few cents higher at $38.37. Even our more conservative sources thought trading would close in the low $40s.

    But while the numbers are, as one candid entrepreneur expressed it, “a total crapshoot,” almost everyone we spoke to was quick to point out that both Facebook’s revenues and its stock price are still very much in their infancy.

    “This is an eight-year-old company,” pointed out Rebecca Lieb, an Altimeter Group analyst. “When Google went public, they had only recently developed ad products. Facebook is at the beginning of mobile products, advertising products — and it hasn’t even started with commerce products.”

    “Facebook has just scratched the surface of its revenue and advertising,” said Menlo Ventures managing director Mark Siegel. “They’re going to grow with a much more diverse income stream than what they have today.”

    Siegel, who bought shares today and said he plans to hang onto them, concluded, “I think Facebook is a good long-term investment.”

    Facebook’s shaky standing with advertisers has been troubling, especially as one high-profile advertiser packed up and went home just days before the IPO.

    The Facebook IPO

    Shares were priced at $38

    Bad sign: GM pulls out of Facebook ads

    Facebook employees celebrated the IPO with a hackathon

    On IPO day, the company gets slapped with a privacy lawsuit

    Facebook stock slides, taking other tech stocks with it

    Analysts warn us: This one won’t pop

    Facebook closes at a disappointing $38

    This move and related stats prompted highly unfavorable statements from experts. For example, Pace University marketing professor Larry Chiagouris said, “The Facebook IPO is… likely to be a disappointment to all the new investors. This is because its real financial value is tied to its marketing value, and the marketing community is increasingly recognizing that Facebook is of very limited value as a marketing tactic.”

    But Lieb said a lot of the angst around Facebook’s ad performance has to do with the fact that agencies and marketers are still figuring out how to use Facebook’s tools.

    “It’s a completely different form of online advertising,” Lieb said, stating that Google’s ad network had previously defined a search-based paradigm for online advertising. But as we shift from search-based online behavior to social networking, she said, “Advertisers still have to figure out how to work in these environments. It’s not just about a display ad.

    “It’s a brand new form of advertising and marketing, but I don’t think it’s at all mature yet,” the analyst concluded.

    While advertisers need to do better at making Facebook marketing work, Facebook needs to do better at indicating to brands, investors, and the public about where its revenue is going to come from.

    “Facebook will crash and burn unless the company can better communicate where it is going with its business,” said investor relations communications expert Jeff Corbin. “The people who will suffer will be those caught up in the frenzy and purchase Facebook stock [today] at what will probably be a high.”

    Still, every social media expert between here and Timbuktu has come forward with thoughtful and creative ways for Facebook to make money. All Facebook has to do now is figure out how to capitalize on at least one of them without compromising users’ data and privacy, thus losing the userbase that makes Facebook value in the first place.

    “Facebook is a highly creative and deeply resourced company that has the potential to develop wonderful products,” said Lieb.

    “Are they gonna do it? We hope so.”

    Filed under: deals, VentureBeat

    Read More...
  • At the end of Facebook’s first day of public trading, shares were selling for around 9.5 percent less than their opening price. By the time the closing bell rang, the stock ticker symbol FB sat at $38.06.

    Facebook got off to a rocky start this morning, offering shares at $38. Intense trading volume early in the morning led to an opening price of $42. However, share prices slowly sank back down to the company’s original offering price.

    Analysts who had previously been bullish on Facebook are surprised. Early investors are disappointed. And social media enthusiasts are at least somewhat shocked.

    “Our Private Shares Group traded stock the week before the first S-1 at $45, and we did a lot of volume. The market clearly supported a share price in the $40s,” said Michael Pachter, managing director for equity research at Wedbush Securities.

    “But Facebook showed a sequential decline in revenue in Q1, so it is likely that some investors were spooked and began to question the company’s growth prospects,” he continued.

    “I have a $44 one-year price target, so it’s a great investment below that level, not as good an investment above that level.”

    The Facebook IPO

    Shares were priced at $38

    Bad sign: GM pulls out of Facebook ads

    Facebook employees celebrated the IPO with a hackathon

    ON IPO day, the company get slapped with a privacy lawsuit

    Facebook stock slides, taking other tech stocks with it

    Analysts warn us: This one won’t pop

    Calling the $38 price “fair,” Dunn & Bradstreet tech expert Lee Simmons said before the closing bell, “Facebook was less likely to rocket out of the gates on opening day… My educated guess places Facebook comfortably above the top-end of its price range on Friday.”

    Still, touting the site’s billion-strong userbase, investors are pegging Facebook stock as a good bet for the long haul.

    “I think it is a good long-term investment,” said Mark Siegel, managing partner at Menlo Ventures. “The nature of the product itself makes it difficult to be displaced… I think it’s that kind of a core, bellweather company in a tech sector. It’s gotten there remarkably fast, but it’s there.”

    However, Siegel noted at in the short term, he expected “volatility” in Facebook’s performance and said there was “no way, not a chance” it would see the eight-fold growth that competitor Google has had since its 2004 IPO.

    “There’s going to be a lot of crazy demand by people, but I don’t think it’s going to get to $60 [any time soon],” the VC continued. “In the next couple years, it might trade at $60 per share, but… I think institutional investors would start getting heartburn before it got up that high.”

    But this low closing price isn’t necessarily a bad thing for Facebook, points out Gartner analyst Ray Valdez.

    “Well-managed IPOs reward initial sellers (early investors and the company itself) with robust prices that don’t leave too much money on the table,” he said.

    “Facebook’s revenue model is still a work in progress. The mobile sector will remain a challenge for Facebook in the short-term. Over the long-term, Facebook has a good chance of cracking the code of monetizing user engagement across platforms, but accomplishing this will require significant innovation in both business and technology domains.”

    David-Michel Davies, president of The Webby Awards and co-founder of Internet Week New York, had the honor of ringing the closing bell at the NASDAQ stock exchange. “There’s been a huge focus on… what this means for the future of the web and what this means for other IPOs,” he told us in a phone conversation.

    And despite the social network’s inauspicious debut, Davies and millions like him remain optimistic about the future of Facebook and of other, smaller social media companies.

    “At the end of the day, its hard to overstate how important social is to the web. We’re living in a world where people have changed behaviors in a significant way. People now will start their day in a social environment and make a lot of important decision for their life there — what to buy, what to eat, where to go at night, what books to read.

    “It’s a really big change, and it’s not going away… This is definitely a big moment, and this IPO showcases how big that change is.”

    We’re honoring FB at the Webbies on Monday… They won the Webby for people’s vote for social change.

    Filed under: VentureBeat

    Read More...
  • PayPal processes 60% of web transactions, Google is the fastest payment gateway, and some unlucky surfer had to wait over 92 seconds for his online purchase to complete.

    Those are only a few of the findings in New Relic’s study of the web’s most popular payment gateways (infographic below). A payment gateway is the web equivalent of a modern cash register: It ensures that you are you, that you appropriately have access to your card, and that you can, in fact, be trusted to pay for the purchase you’re making.

    New Relic, a web app performance management company, studied 65,000 payment transactions by 21,000 web applications and came up with some astonishing findings.

    PayPal is by far the biggest payment processor on the web, at least according to this sample. During the test period, PayPal processed over 66,000 payments, more than three times as many as the nearest competitor, Authorize.net. Google Checkout came in fifth with just over 3400 payments.

    Google does win, however, in the speed category. Google Checkout’s average payment processing time was a blistering .26 seconds. In less than a third of a second, New Relic spokesman John Essex said, Google has to “collect and transfer your payment information – name, address, card number, purchase details, etc. – to the financial institution”, and then, of course, query Visa or Mastercard to see if you are a good credit risk, get a response, and return it to the website’s e-commerce engine. PayPal’s performance was only mediocre, but hardly pokey, averaging just under one and a half seconds.

    The longest transaction, by far, was via an Australian payment gateway, Eway.com.au. At least one payment took at least 92.44 seconds to complete. Datacash and USAepay.com were not far behind, at 89 and 56 seconds, respectively. Those are the extremes, however; average performance at these services was 3-4 seconds.

    Speed is critical in any web application, according to Essex: “As with any step in the online shopping experience, it’s increasingly critical for the payment gateway functions to happen quickly and effortlessly for the consumer – any lag in transaction time can lead to loss of a return customer. No one likes to be kept waiting.”

    Least of all the websites that are waiting for your money.

    Image credit: Flick user Steve Snodgrass

    Filed under: VentureBeat

    Read More...
  • Next month’s Electronic Entertainment Expo, taking place in Los Angeles from June 5-7, is starting to look a little sparse.

    While the annual trade show is usually an opportunity for the games industry’s biggest companies to announce titles, unveil new hardware, and demonstrate their questionable choices in event hosts, this year’s event is looking more notable for what we won’t be seeing. Several high-profile projects and developers will not be present at the conference. That isn’t to say that we can’t still expect some surprises, but the list of stuff we won’t be hearing about continues to grow. Things like:

    Respawn Entertainment’s unannounced game

    Fans have been eagerly awaiting the first offering from Jason West and Vince Zampella’s Respawn Entertainment, which was founded after their unceremonious departure from Call of Duty developer Infinity Ward in 2010. Those fans will have to wait a little longer, though, because while representatives of Respawn will be attending the show, they will not be revealing anything about their secret project. I guess we’ll have to go back to squinting at that blurry screenshot they released last year (below).

    The Nintendo Wii U’s pricing and launch date

    Nintendo has announced that it will be revealing the final specifications and launch titles for its upcoming high-definition console at E3, but we’ll still have to wait to hear how much the new hardware will cost and when exactly it’s coming out this fall. This doesn’t really come as a surprise considering the company didn’t finalize launch information on the Wii until two months before it came out.

    Anything about Sony or Microsoft’s next consoles

    Both Sony and Microsoft have confirmed that they won’t be showing off their top-secret followups to the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 (respectively). Sony will likely be focusing more on upcoming software for its struggling PlayStation Vita, and Microsoft will likely spend a lot of time talking about console-exclusive titles like Halo 4 and … well, we can’t rule out any surprise announcements, but Halo 4 is probably the main one.

    Any Valve game containing the number 3

    Developer Valve Software is going to E3, but that’s as close as it’s getting to that number. The company has stated that it will not be announcing anything new, opting to focus on previously revealed titles like Defense of the Ancients 2 and Counterstrike: Global Offensive.

    BioShock Infinite

    Developer Irrational Games’ latest was one of the most anticipated releases of this year until it was delayed until 2013. Unfortunately, we won’t be hearing anything at E3 about the now most-anticipated release of 2013, because Irrational and publisher Take-Two Interactive would like to put as much time as possible into, you know, making it. “Preparing for these events takes time away from development, time we’re going to use instead to get the best version of Infinite into your hands in February,” Irrational head Ken Levine said while announcing the delay last week.

    Grand Theft Auto V

    Grand Theft Auto V developer Rockstar Games won’t be at the Expo at all, which means we’re not going to see anything about its next big release. I have reason to believe that this game will have cars in it, but I suppose the speculation as to precisely what kinds of cars it’ll contain will have to continue. Rockstar’s absence is especially odd in light of the fact that rumors have it that GTAV will release this winter.

    Filed under: games

    Read More...
  • woman with shopping bags

    We’ve got a lot of stories this Wednesday for you. Click each link below to learn more about each story.

    If you’re hankering more funding news throughout the day, you can subscribe to our Deals Channel RSS feed by either clicking the red RSS icon at the top of this page or adding the Deals Channel feed link to your favorite reader. And as always, send funding news our way at [email protected]

    Mocavo grabs funding for its family tree

    TechStars 2011 alum Mocavo has raised $4 million in its first round of funding in a bid to help people find their ancestors through its search engine. The coveted first round of funding comes from Foundry Group. Seth Levine, Foundry Group’s Managing Director, will join Mocavo’s board.

    Wave Accounting nabs $12M

    Small business startup Wave Accounting has raised $12 million in its second round of funding, the company announced today. Wave, which offers free accounting software for small companies, feels that managing “the books” is a complicated and dreaded task that isn’t any easier thanks to desktop accounting software. Social+Capital Partnership led the round. Charles River Ventures and OMERS Ventures also contributed.

    Big data, big money for Palantir

    Data analysis company Palantir has raised $56 million in its latest round of funding, through two unknown investors, according to an SEC filing today. Palantir has been seemingly very successful from its tools that analyze all sorts of data.

    Bitly may have new funding in the works

    Four-year-old link shortening service Bitly is reportedly working on raising a $20 million funding round and launching a few new products. The link shortening service also offers enterprise link analytics. So far Bitly has raised $15 million from a laundry list of investors including Ron Conway, SV Angel, and AOL Ventures.

    Fotolia wins $150M

    Fotolia received a $150 million growth equity investment from leveraged buyout firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Co. The company claims to be the leading stock photography site in Europe.

    HomeMe raises $5M

    Russian home shopping site HomeMe has raised $5 million in funding. Mangrove Capital, ABRT, and AddVenture led the round for the Moscow-based company.

    Vox Mobile gets funded

    Vox Mobile grabbed a $7.5 million investment to help manage mobile devices for businesses. The company also helps train employees on how use mobile devices. Edison Ventures led the round and Permal Capital also participated.

    Appcelerator raises $3M

    App development platform Appcelerator has closed a $3 million funding round, The Next Web reported. Presidio Ventures led the round for the company that helps companies build native apps.

    ModCloth grabs $25M funding round

    Clothing and home decor site ModCloth has raised $25 million in funding. The site offers vintage inspired clothing and accessories. Norwest Venture Partners led the round.

    Woman with shopping bags image via Shutterstock

    Filed under: deals, VentureBeat

    Read More...
  • verizon-guy-worried

    Verizon Wireless will soon get rid of its unlimited data plans held by customers who were grandfathered in before the company launched tiered data pricing, according to a report from FierceWireless.

    Verizon CFO Fran Shammo reportedly told an audience at the JPMorgan Technology, Media, and Telecom conference today that 3G unlimited data plan holders will eventually have switch to a “data-share” plan. The company’s data-share plans will launch this summer and effectively end single device/single data plan polices. But data-share plans are tiered and anyone upgrading to use a 4G-enabled device must have one.

    It’s unclear if Verizon will force all of its users with unlimited 3G data to switch plans if they aren’t switching to a 4G-enabled phone. Apple iPhone 4S customers right now, for example, only use 3G data and have quite some time before their two-year contracts are up. Will they be allowed to use unlimited data until they switch to a 4G-enabled iPhone 5 or Android superphone?

    Verizon ditched unlimited data plans last summer, in line with what AT&T has done. Sprint, notably, still offers unlimited 3G and 4G data plans and might even offer unlimited 4G LTE data when its second 4G network launches. T-Mobile still has some unlimited data offers as well, but does not have the iPhone.

    We’ve contacted Verizon for clarification on its upcoming data plan options, and we will update this post if it gets back.

    Filed under: mobile

    Read More...